Interesting things I've recently done? Let's see...
Last weekend we went up to Palmeston North, and I went to see the final performance of the Mikado with one of my brothers. It was nice to have seen the first and last shows, and compare how they'd changed -- you could really tell that some of the leads had settled into their performances, and I got to see Giffy's line! :)
This was also the Weekend of Many Boardgames, where C had her first experience of Settlers of Catan, and we played three or four games of Munchkin. I also bought a bunch of Cheapass Games products, including "Save Doctor Lucky", "Save Doctor Lucky on Moonbase Copernicus", and "Doctor Lucky Ambivalence Pack" (to compliment my copy of "Kill Doctor Lucky"), as well as "Captain Park's Imaginary Polar Expedition", "One False Step For Mankind" and "One False Step Home". Oh, and "Cube Farm".
Of course, I never seem to actually play many boardgames. :)
Finished watching the first season of Gilmore Girls, and pronounce myself intrigued. We'll watch the second season just as soon as we work out where C has put it. In the meantime, we've been watching this and that, including the pilot episode of Eureka, which was pretty fun. In many ways, I can see that working with TV shows would give more instant gratification; but on the other hand, I'm much more likely to see my name in the credits of a movie. ;)
Oh, speaking of which -- I assume people have seen that we're working on Dambusters, and that PJ has just got the movie rights to the Temeraire series, which is apparently "The Napoleonic Wars, with dragons". Could be good fun; no news about whether he'd direct it, though.
Speaking of directing -- those of you who've been in the hot-seat might be interested in this entry in Ken Levine's blog, when he talks about directing for the first time, after being a writer on the show for a while. (Of course, the show he was directing was M*A*S*H, so a slightly different situation.) Anyway, it might comfort you to know how much harder it could have been.
* * *
I don't know how they plan to make money, but I figured that this might be of interest to some of my readers -- Gigasize is a file uploading/sharing site which has some free options that may useful to some of you. I don't think I'd base a business on it, but I could imagine sticking stuff there instead of bloating my inbox. :)
Unfortunately, I've had a series of browser crashes recently, so all the vital, important news (such as the driver in China who decided to let her dog have a go with steering) has been lost to the mists of time. I have retained something moderately topical, however -- a Guardian article about href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/chile/story/0,,1038615,00.html">The Pinochet File, a book about the military coup in Chile on September 11th, 1973. I find it weird to thing that it happened only a few weeks before I was born... anyway, one of the things the book apparently focusses on is how the US government financed, supported, advised and abetted General Pinochet, both before and during the coup, and afterwards.
I guess that's one big argument against "9/11" being a CIA conspiracy; it's not like they'd seek to pervert the democratic process and subvert a country through fear on the anniversary of doing the same thing down south. On the other hand, I suppose you could argue that if there were such people, they might want to leave hints like this, in the same way some master forger might leave some sort of hint. But while I find it easy to construct these sort of political conspiracies, I find it hard to believe in them. Corporate and financial skulduggery, on the other
hand, is much easier to swallow.
* * *
A discussion I've had with C (and later with others) recently was -- if you were going to be sent back to 1900, and could take three things, what would you take?
(My somewhat facetious first answer was "Wellington", so let's limit it to things you can carry.)
One problem is that you don't want to rely on anything too delicate; a laptop and solar-power generator (with a bunch of books on DVDs) may seem like a good idea, but it's pretty vulnerable to even mild trauma, and the nearest tech support is seventy or eighty years away.
One thing that C & I agreed is that you'd want money, and quite a bit of it. After all, money is one of those things that helps separate the mad from the merely eccentric. (I guess that it'd technically be counterfeiting, even if you bought real cash from that era to bring back with you, since there'd end up being two copies of the notes; but I doubt you'd be able to take back enough to affect the economy, and you should be able to make something indistinguishable from the real thing with modern techniques.) You'd also want a bunch of synthetic gemstones, since they'd be pretty cheap here, but just as valuable as the real thing back then.
It's been interesting what other people have reacted with. For example, one guy's first, immediate response was, "An AK47. Not to hard for them to make, only just outside their level of tech, cheap, reliable, and a definite edge." My main thought was a bunch of deep-analysis history books, so that they could try to avoid the problems of the past.
The question then becomes, I guess, who do you tell about the stuff you know? Because if someone who doesn't have access to you believes that you're giving their rivals a huge advantage, well, I can imagine that they might not have many scruples about taking you out.
Oh, and I can just imagine sitting in my mansion sipping cognac, and suddenly slapping my head and saying, "Oh yeah! Big bird flu in 1918! Uh... better write some letters to some heads of government, telling them to try to prevent a pandemic."
I guess that this stuff (though usually without the foreknowledge) is kinda explored in Stross' "The Merchant Prince" series, and many of the golden-age writers like H. Beam Piper. I think I picked 1900 as being far back enough to be able to have a big impact, but with indoor plumbing, and close enough that I can remember more of the history.
* * *
And to end on a slightly surreal note: bacon taped to a cat, The Egg Series and other photographic work by Leonard Nimoy, El Reg reporting on a mysterious scale replica of a section of the Chinese/India border, stretching 900x700m and representing an area 450x350km. I mean, what possible use is there for something like that.
Oh, and the current craze at work: movie titles with the words "in my pants" appended. Like:
The Sting In My Pants
Tremors In My Pants
Dangerous Liaisons In My Pants
A Fistful of Dollars In My Pants
Ninja Demon Massacre In My Pants
Free Willy In My Pants
The Frighteners In My Pants
Four Weddings And A Funeral In My Pants
Finding Nemo In My Pants
Dark Water In My Pants
etc etc etc.
Yep. Highbrow, for sure. :)
Posted by svend at September 15, 2006 7:44 PMA Few Good Men...in my pants
Freddy got Fingered....in my pants
Ferris Buellers Day Off...in my pants
Psycho Beach Party...in my pants
The list goes on :o)
K
Posted by: Kate at September 15, 2006 10:25 PMYou want highbrow?
The Incredible Lightness Of Being In My Pants
Oh yeah, and how about Love Actually In My Pants?
Posted by: Andrew at September 16, 2006 4:59 PMDamn you, now I can't stop thinking of these.
Grease In My Pants
The Wiz In My Pants
Antz In My Pants
Scratch In My Pants
Rize In My Pants
Big Fish In My Pants
The Big Red One In My Pants
Where The Girls Are In My Pants
Twelve Angry Men In My Pants
Twelve Monkeys In My Pants
To tear us away from the pants for a moment, I spotted in the comments on the "Bacon-taped-to-a-cat" page that someone suggested attempting to "tape-Kevin-Bacon-to-a-cat."
Which, of course, brings us back to "Flashdance in my pants."
Posted by: Scott A at September 18, 2006 3:55 PMI like it better when it's "replace a word in the title with 'pants'" - it's a more challenging than just putting "in my pants" at the end, and the jokes get more varied and surreal rather than just being the same slightly naughty joke over and over.
Thus:
Because It Is Bitter, and Because It Is My Pants
Pants On Fire
The Good, the Bad, and the Pants
The Empire Pants Back
Raiders of the Lost Pants
Aguirre, the Pants of God
etc.
Posted by: Joey at September 18, 2006 5:08 PMNah, if you play that game it's better to replace a particular word with another particular word: eg replace "touch" with "monkey" (works better on song titles)
Monkeying from a distance, When I think about you I monkey myself, Monkeyed by the hand of god...
Posted by: Andrew at September 19, 2006 4:10 PMAs that "one guy" with the AK47 (AKM47 as I pedantically said) I feel I must expand slightly:
In much the same way that a doctor might not need to take back commonly made medicines, so too would a scholar of history avoid the need to encumber himself with both a lot of books in addition to his automatic weapons.
Nice to see you Svend, maybe next time I am in town we can work out some boardgaming? :D
Posted by: Trithemius at September 19, 2006 6:01 PMYou could erase the lexicon and replace it with blue - oh wait, that's been done.
Replacing every proper noun with "a monkey" could be fun.
Posted by: Pearce at September 20, 2006 10:01 AMI'm glad you enjoyed the Mikado :)
Did you see Faust?
Cheers
G
The problem of making money whilst living in the past is clearly solved by citing Back to the Future Part 2; I think a more interesting question is how you stay sane knowing what you know now, back then. For example you would have to sit back and watch the rise of Fascism knowing full well the likely outcome.
On this basis I think that the chemical formula for LSD would be a good place to start - and it's easily scribbled on the back of an envelope so it's much lighter than a machine gun. Then if all else went pear-shaped you could sit back and trip your trotters off.
I agree with you about the vulnerability of DVDs, but you definitely need some sort of modern entertainment, so I'm thinking that a Beatles songbook is the right thing (you could take The Stones instead though I suppose). Not only would this make you potentially very very famous, and able to influence things a bit more, but would also mean that all those war movies would have a slightly more surreal soundtrack!
So, item number 3. Ho-hum that's a toughy. The gist of my items so far seems to be suggesting the re-creation of the swinging-sixties at the start of the 20th Century, so on that basis I will opt for a pair of denim jeans. Not only will that befoxxle the fashion people of the day, but will ensure my butt looks way cute.
Posted by: Pete at October 2, 2006 7:26 PM